Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. By Keep forgetting about that. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Source: DxOMark. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Id probably buy a new car. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock Help us by suggesting a value. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. I do use this feature fairly often as an alternative to using a screw in BW filter. There are two things to be separated here. has a removable battery. When it comes to making video, things are different! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. The body is pretty well weather sealed. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . Display as a link instead, I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. Weight is certainly a thing though! If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. Be the first. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Some cards are woefully slow. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. That said, I do miss the live view feature. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. Your previous content has been restored. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. I would still rather have the m10 over all the others though, but I definitely see you point. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. Is the 262 different in this regard? For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. : very useful. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. I missed his musings in AP. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. Why torture yourself? I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Can you compare side by side, please? Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. Literally. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). Image: Leica. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. Source: DxOMark. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. Thanks. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. This thing has live-view, and video. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. . The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? I would have thought that the overall condition of the camera is more important and would suggest that in the long run the choice of lens will make more difference to the pictures and enjoyment you can get out of it. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. I have a X113 and an M262. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. The ideas with Leica is identities. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Using the right SD card is key here. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Functionalism be damned. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Yes!! The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Keep up the good words! I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. You can post now and register later. And thats pushing it. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. Menu. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. The sensor is not the same, by the way. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. I was once very happy with my M9. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. The transport lever on the Leica M3. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. I did eventually get the 1.25 viewfinder magnifier to go with it. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. Privacy policy. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. It depends on your needs. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Paste as plain text instead, Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. The battery can be recharged and used over again. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Of course they can, but you have them. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. The sensor is not the same, by the way. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. If not, get the 262. Display as a link instead, The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. That said, M10 GAS is real. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. Great write up! The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. To a degree, I can see their point too. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. For the M240, forget it. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. I prefer live view for wider lenses to an external viewfinder. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish.