R v Emmett. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Marjoram, R v (1999) (Court of Appeal) Pagett, R v (1983) 76 Cr App R 279 (Court of Appeal) Smith, R v [1959] 2 QB 35; White, R v [1910] 2 KB 124 (Court of Appeal) Subscribe on YouTube. On the first occasion, she was at risk of death, and lost consciousness. It was not suggested that any rape . In English law, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 removes the element of consent from the actus reus of many offences, so that only the act itself and the age or other constraints need to be proved, including: children under 16 years generally, and under 18 years if having sexual relations with persons in a position of trust or with family members over 18 years; and persons with a mental disorder that impedes choice who are induced, threatened, or deceived, or who have sexual relations with care workers. b. Crimes of Interpersonal Violence and Assualt contain degrees of harm of 4 types from no harm, abh, gbh to death - Continuum of harm; degree is a value judgement (of the judge) - Should such a crucial point be left to the discretion of the judge; influenced by morality etc flaw displayed in Brown w. homophobia Contentious point creating the most Historically in the UK, the defense was denied when the injuries caused amounted to a maim (per Hawkins' Pleas of the Crown (8th ed.) most states have a rule that an abusive husband can be prosecuted even if the wife does not co-operate and give evidence to rebut the husband's defense that the wife consented). 1996;101:109-110 . In this work, a surface cationized inorganic-organic hybrid foam was produced from porous geopolymer (GP) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). Elemental analysis (C/H/N/S) was conducted by an elemental analyzer (PerkinElmer Series II CHNS/O Analyser). Further, the law cannot expect people suddenly to become honest with each other and to counsel the use of condoms, and there may be negative consequences if HIV was to be disclosable, because those who ought to take medical advice and undergo tests, might be discouraged from doing so. To recap Part 1. Consequently, the Appeal Court decided that had the women known of his infection, their consent to unprotected sexual intercourse would have been a valid defence. However, this argument is proved invalid with the case of R v Emmett (1999), as in this case the defence of consent could not be used for sadomasochist acts between heterosexual . In R v Linekar [1995] QB 250, a prostitute stated the fact that she would not have consented to sexual intercourse if she had known that her client was not intending to pay, but there was no fraud-induced consent as to the nature of the activity, nor was the identity of the client relevant. BAILIIs OpenLaw Project supports legal education by making leading cases freely and openly available on the internet. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. WHERE JUSTICES were sitting as a youth court they could make a secure training order for 12 months under s 1 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, since the well-established provisions in ss 31 and 133 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, which limited them to imposing a sentence of six months' detention for a single offence, were explicitly couched in terms of imprisonment and did not apply to secure training orders. Leaving aside repugnance and moral objection, both of which are entirely natural, but neither of which are in my opinion grounds upon which the court could properly create a new crime.. The degree of harm was such as to make it appropriate for the criminal law to interfere and accordingly the appeal was dismissed. Citing: Cited - Regina v Emmett CACD 18-Jun-1999 The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. shane kilcher house; ridge hill apartments for rent; example of psycholinguistics in daily life; beda appointment dan meeting di outlook; . Here the culpable act was not holding the reins, which was not the . "It is difficult to see how one could ever consent to that once fraud was indeed established. . The defendant was convicted of manslaughter under section 20 and 47 OAPA. In criminal law, consent may be used as an excuse and prevent the defendant from incurring liability for what was done.[1]. These cases overrule the implicit ratio decidendi of Clarence that non-physical injuries can be injuries within the scope of the Offences Against the Person Act and without the need to prove a physical application of violence, Lord Steyn describing Clarence as a "troublesome authority", and, in the specific context of the meaning of "inflict" in section 20, said expressly that Clarence "no longer assists". Violence in Sport and the Criminal Law. The court held that, even if the victim had consented to a being restrained and gagged, his consent was invalid because there was no way for him to communicate its withdrawal once the gag was in his mouth.[4]. In R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23, at a time when the defendant knew that he was suffering from a venereal disease, he had sexual intercourse and communicated the disease to his wife. The injuries were inflicted during consensual homosexual sadomasochist activities. She brands the prosecution as an abuse of power by the state to interfere with personal relations. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Firstpost Homes Ltd v Johnson and Others: CA 14 Aug 1995, Regina v Brown (Anthony); Regina v Lucas; etc, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. Mr Justice Stephens had said (at p.44) "the only sorts of fraud which so far destroy the effect of a woman's consent as to convert a connection consented to in fact into a rape are frauds as to the nature of the act itself, or as to the identity of the person who does the act. For an offence to be tried summarily, a) the DPP must consent to a summary trial b) the District Court must be satisfied that the offence is minor. In R v Brown, the House of Lords rejected the defense on public policy grounds (see below). Their Lordships in the Court of [3], The issue of consent in the course of sado-masochistic sexual activity was considered in R v Stein (2007), a case in which a participant died as a result of being gagged. There, the judges ruled that his customers written consent to carry out ear and nipple removals and a tongue-splitting procedure did not amount to a defence. Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? He had HIV/Aids, and was found to have transmitted the disease by intercourse when the victims were not informed of his condition. Fang JT, et al. FNCB Ltd v Barnet Devanney & Co Ltd; CA (Morritt, Sedley LJJ, Lindsay J) 1 July 1999. Thus, the consent in licensed boxing events is to intentional harm within the rules and a blow struck between rounds would be an assault. Had she been aware, she would not have submitted to the intercourse. 5SAH LCCSA Encrochat Webinar Lecture Notes from 29 July 2020, Youth & Video Remand Hearings Principles & Procedure document, London Sites Reopening w/c 15th June 2020, 5SAH LCCSA Webinar Loss of Control v Diminished Responsibility: Mark Cotter QC & Benjamin Burge 14th July @ 3:30pm, Free Webinar on the new Sentencing Code due to come into force on 1st October 2020, 5SAH & LCCSA Webinar The New Sentencing Code Demystifying Risk Assessments, Payment, Delivery, Refunds and Cancellations Policy. He was convicted of occasioning actual bodily harm. Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies. Accordingly, in such circumstances the issue either of informed consent, or honest belief in it will only rarely arise: in reality, in most cases, the contention would be wholly artificial. The Criminal Law list is current up to the Last Updated date above and may not include recent decisions. Nevertheless, at trial BM was found guilty of three offences of wounding with intent under s.18 of the OAPA. That was not to say, however, that the court would lightly disregard obligations entered into freely under a contract. westfield london kiosk rental prices. Their BrunauerEmmett-Teller (BET) surface area is 584 and 672 m 2 g 1, respectively, with corresponding pore volume of 0.33 cm 3 g 1 and 0.38 cm 3 g 1. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media This was not tattooing, it was not something which absented pain or dangerousness and the agreed medical evidence is in each case, certainly on the first occasion, there was a very considerable degree of danger to life; on the second, there was a degree of injury to the body. With that conclusion, this Court entirely agrees.. It was not therefore necessary to show ongoing dishonesty at the date when a notice of intervention was served. Richard Davies QC (Vizards) for the appellant; Nigel Baker QC, Desmond Bloom-Davis (Antony Gorley & Co, Newbury) for the respondent. Till was born to working-class parents on the South Side of Chicago. THE COURT'S jurisdiction to refuse to grant an injunction where there had been a violation of a right and instead to grant damages was good in principle for both negative and positive obligations. These are situations in which a victim may have given apparent consent to parting with ownership or possession of money and/or goods, or to generally suffering a loss, but this consent is treated as vitiated by the dishonesty of the person making the untrue representations. In properly regulated sport, there is a legal right to cause incidental injury. Kidnapping may be established by carrying away by fraud. Three of our glass powders, i.e. This article has no summary. Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in, Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile. This decision was confirmed in the ECHR in Laskey v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 39 on the basis that although the prosecution might have constituted an interference with the private lives of those involved, it was justified for the protection of public health. Although Haggart was bigger, and trained as a boxer, Jobidon landed one punch directly in Haggart's face, which knocked him unconscious and he fell on a hood of a car. Emmett Till, in full Emmett Louis Till, (born July 25, 1941, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.died August 28, 1955, Money, Mississippi), African American teenager whose murder catalyzed the emerging civil rights movement. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. After that, 5 ml of APTES was added and the system was refluxed at 80 C for 24 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere. R v Rai [1999] EWCA Crim 2250; [2000] 1 Cr App R 242: Court of Appeal (EWCA Crim) Deception; failure to disclose change in circumstances: 379: trader joe's chocolate ganache cake LIVE; madison 56ers apparel; r v emmett 1999 case summary. A paper on the website The Student Lawyer examined the basis for fraud as grounds for negating consent, in the context of the decision not to charge officers involved in the UK undercover policing relationships scandal. Regina v Emmett: CACD 18 Jun 1999 The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. The general rule, therefore, is that violence involving the deliberate and intentional infliction of bodily harm is and remains unlawful notwithstanding that its purpose is the sexual gratification of one or both participants. Consent cannot be inferred by reason of any words or conduct of a victim where force, threat of force, coercion or taking advantage of a coercive environment undermined the victims ability to give voluntary and genuine consent; The application of solid adsorbents for oil spills remediation has gained attention in recent times. Andrew is secretly having an affair but denies this to his wife; they later have sex; Barney exaggerates his financial success and pretends to like the same music and films as his date in order to impress her; they later have sex; Charlie dyes his hair and pretends to be in his mid-30s on a dating website when he is really in his 50s; he later has sex with someone he meets online; Derek is unhappy in his marriage and is considering whether to leave his wife; he does not mention his misgivings before they have sex. The second ceremony will do no more than expose the prospective spouse to a charge of bigamy. They were cheering on the boxers whose conduct was likely to and did produce a breach of the peace, so any mutual consent given by the fighters was vitiated by the public nature of the entertainment irrespective of the degree of injury caused or intended. A comparison with HIV transmission: The case of R v Dica [30] Insightful recent commentary by the likes of Sharon Cowan on the risk of STI infection as an exceptional category is useful to this debate, because here we can go even further and say that it is practically impossible to justify distinguishing the Brown practices. 6 of 1980) [1981] QB 715. In New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, consent is not possible when the complainant was asleep or unconscious. how to spot an undercover cop australia; defense criminal investigative service jobs near berlin; mission vista high school calendar; On a different occasion, she agreed that he could pour fuel from a lighter onto her breasts and set fire to the fuel. They were convicted of robbery and appealed on the grounds that the force came after they had appropriate the jewellery and thus did not come within the requirement of being immediately before or at the time of stealing. WHERE A party to litigation saw another party's documents without privilege being claimed for them, he was fully entitled, in the absence of fraud or obvious mistake, to assume that privilege had been waived. 99011191/Z2 Bailii Offences Against the Person Act 1861 47 England and Wales Citing: Cited Regina v Brown (Anthony); Regina v Lucas; etc HL 11-Mar-1993 The appellants had been convicted of assault, after having engaged in consensual acts of sado-masochism in which they inflicted varying degreees of physical self harm. 9901191 ZR; The Times, 15 October 1999: Court of Appeal (EWCA Crim) Consent; sado-masochism; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults: 90: . THE FOLLOWING notes of judgments were prepared by the reporters of the All England Law Reports. Judgement for the case R v Wilson. In Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, there is no consent where the complainant is so affected by alcohol or other drugs as "to be incapable of freely agreeing" to the sexual activity. As an application of parens patriae, for example, minors cannot consent to having sexual intercourse under a specified age even though the particular instance of statutory rape might be a "victimless" offense. When this tape accidentally found its way into the hands of the police, they were all arrested and . ", Clarke, "Law and Order on the Courts: The Application of Criminal Liability for Intentional Fouls During Sporting Events", (2000) Vol. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. This suggests that consent will only operate as a defense in all but the most exceptional of cases where there has already been prior disclosure of known HIV positive status. 5. If an individual who knows that he is suffering from HIV conceals this stark fact from his sexual partner, the principle of her personal autonomy is not enhanced if he is exculpated when he recklessly transmits HIV to her through consensual sexual intercourse. Lord Templeman said public policy meant the law should protect people from the unpredictably dangerous and degrading practices that involved genital torture and violence to the buttocks, anus, penis, testicles and nipples. There was no evidence of any sexual motive. Consent cannot be inferred by reason of any words or conduct of a victim where the victim is incapable of giving genuine consent, In Australia, if a sexual partner was asleep, unconscious or a jury decides that a complainant was unable to consent, sexual contact is considered rape. In R v Emmett (unreported, 18 June 1999), as part of their consensual sexual activity, the woman allowed her partner to cover her head with a plastic bag, tying it tightly at the neck. In R. v Konzani, the defence argued that by consenting to unprotected sexual intercourse with the defendant, the women were impliedly consenting to all the risks associated with sexual intercourse which included infection with HIV. ALTHOUGH R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 was not authority in all circumstances for the proposition that consent did not form a basis for a defence in cases of sado-masochistic prac-tices, nevertheless when the realistic risk was of more than transient injury the issue of consent became immaterial. The problem has always been to decide at what level the victim's consent becomes ineffective. In an appeal against conviction for two offences of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising out of sado-masochistic acts between two consenting adults, the issue of consent was immaterial where there was a realistic risk of harm beyond a merely transient or trivial injury . The appellants in. For consent in sexual violence cases, see, The examples and perspective in this article, Legal right to cause, or consent to, injury, For a more general discussion, see Dennis J. Baker, "The Moral Limits of Consent as a Defense in the Criminal Law," 12(1), Learn how and when to remove this template message, UK undercover policing relationships scandal, "Law Teacher.net - Free Case Law Database, Essay Marking and Custom Essay Writing", "Md. R v Clarence had not considered the issue of consent because consent to sexual intercourse was assumed to have been given at the beginning of marriage. maria robles reaction paper crm serial crime and criminal profiling understanding sexual homicide paul greenall (2012) summary the article greenall (2012) . he case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts is one of the few judgments that most law students actually read, and the facts tend to stay with them. Chromium, especially hexavalent chromium, can be released into the environment from a variety of industrial sources, like leather processing and finishing, steel processing, ceramic processing, electroplating, catalytic manufacture and drilling muds (Barnhart, 1997, Darrie, 2001, Jacobs and Testa, 2005).Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is the most common Cr species, is highly toxic . R v Wilson (1996), which involved a case where a husband branded his wife's buttocks, upheld that consent can be a valid defence. Equally, her personal autonomy is not normally protected by allowing a defendant who knows that he is suffering from HIV which he deliberately conceals, to assert an honest belief in his partner's informed consent to the risk of the transmission of HIV. Narrow pore size distribution was observed with the maxima at 0.97 and 1.4 nm, respectively, well in line with the predicted pore diameter from structural analysis. The victim had died through strangulation during a sexual assault by the defendant. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. The majority, who found the conduct vile and disgusting, thought the case was about violence being done, which they thought had nothing to do with sex, she says. Eleanor Sharpston QC, one of the barristers who acted for the defendants in the Brown case, says the charges were never designed for prosecuting consensual sex. 1824). 2 of 1992), Automatism; voluntary control; reckless driving, Intoxication; mens rea; specific intent; murder, Involuntary intoxication; mens rea; fault, Intoxication; voluntary/involuntary; nature of drug, Intoxication; voluntary; specific/basic intent, Voluntary intoxication; specific/basic intent; sexual assault, Voluntary intoxication; specific/basic intent; manslaughter, Voluntary intoxication; mistake; attempted murder, Attorney-General of Northern Ireland v Gallagher, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted theft, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted burglary, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted murder, Attempts; more than merely preparatory; attempted robbery, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted false imprisonment, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted rape, Attempts; 'more than merely preparatory'; attempted child abduction, Attempts; attempted handling stolen goods; legal impossibility, Attempts; mens rea; attempted rape; recklessness as to circumstances, Attorney General's Reference (No.3 of 1992), Attempts; mens rea; attempted arson; recklessness as to consequences, Attempts; mens rea; intention; attempting to convert criminal property, Conspiracy; 'carried out in accordance with their intentions', Complicity; principal/secondary party; counselling, Innocent agency; transferred malice; complicity; deliberate variations from plan; murder, Complicity; aiding and abetting; mens rea, Complicity; encouragement: connecting link with offence, Complicity; encouragement; voluntary presence, Complicity; joint enterprise; intention; overwhelming supervening act; homicide, Complicity; mens rea: conditional intention, Complicity; mens rea; knowledge of facts or circumstances, Complicity; mens rea; intention; knowledge of facts or circumstances, Complicity; joint enterprise; overwhelming supervening act; homicide, Complicity; overwhelming supervening act; homicide, Complicity; withdrawal; spontaneous violence, Complicity; principal with defence; aiding buggery, Complicity; principal lacking mens rea; innocent agency, Complicity; procuring; principal lacking mens rea: doli incapax, Aiding and abetting; victims; sexual offences, aiding and abetting; incitement; victims; sexual offences, Assault; telephone calls; imminence; GBH; psychiatric injury, Smith v. Chief Supt. approved the final version of the article and declare no conflict of interest . summaries the situation at para 42: In the public interest, so far as possible, the spread of catastrophic illness must be avoided or prevented. Summary Offence One that is tried in the District Court. Three years later, in the case of R v Wilson, which involved a husband branding his initials on his wifes buttocks with a hot knife, the court of appeal reached the opposite result, ruling that the man had the defence of consent. (it may be that this is to apply in the Court of Appeal only, but this is unclear from the . R v Bennett (1995) - judge obliged to direct jury where reasonable possibility that accused did not form MR. R v Pordage (1975) - about whether did or did not form mens rea, not about whether capable of forming it . The act was considered comparable to tattooing, whilst Brown applied specifically to sadomasochism. The 'nature' of the act here is therefore taking the complainant away by fraud. Hence, the principal offence was committed and, since it would not have taken place had there been no crowd to bet and support the fighters, the secondary parties were also liable. Auteur/autrice de la publication : Post published: 16 juin 2022; Unlawful and dangerousness act manslaughter; dangerousness: foresight of harm, Unlawful and dangerousness act manslaughter; dangerousness: foresight of harm; causation, Unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter; causation, Gross negligence manslaughter; duty of care, Gross negligence manslaughter; gross negligence: ECHR Art.7, Gross negligence manslaughter; risk of death, Voluntary manslaughter: loss of control; delay, Voluntary manslaughter; loss of control; cumulative provocation; qualifying triggers, Voluntary manslaughter; loss of control; qualifying triggers; revenge excluded; marital infidelity, Voluntary manslaughter; loss of control: objective test, Voluntary manslaughter; loss of control; voluntary intoxication, Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; abnormality of mental functioning; alcoholism, Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; 'substantial impairment', Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; intoxication, Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; intoxication/alcoholism, Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; alcoholism, Voluntary manslaughter; diminished responsibility; burden of proof; ECHR Art.6, Theft; property; land; enduring power of attorney, Theft; property; confidential information, Theft; property; anatomical specimens; 'work or skill', Theft; property; property unlawful to possess, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; abandonment, Theft; property 'belonging to another' ; abandonment, R (on the application of Ricketts) v Basildon Magistrates' Court, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; trust property, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; trust property: wills, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to deal with property in particular way: deposits, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to deal with property in particular way, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to deal with property in particular was; charity, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to deal with property in particular way; charity, Theft, property 'belonging to another; obligation to deal with property in a particular way; housing benefit, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to deal with property in a particular way; agency, Theft; property 'belonging to another'; obligation to repay, Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (trading as Crockfords Club), Cheating: Gambling Act 2005; theft; dishonesty, Theft; fraud; conspiracy to defraud; dishonesty. [9] The three complainant women agreed to the appellant showing them how to examine their own breasts. However the Appeal Court judges ruled that before the complainants' consent could provide the appellant with a defence, it had to be an informed and willing consent to the specific risk, here the risk of contracting HIV, rather than the general one of contracting something. Consent in such cases does not exist at all because the act consented to is not the act done. Gross negligence manslaughter; Liability for omissions: duty of care, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/child, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/non-dependent child, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility: drug takers; manslaughter, liability for omissions; contractual duty; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; creation of a dangerous situation; arson, Liability for omissions; police officer: misconduct in public office, Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment; act/omission distinction; murder, Liability for omissions; gross indecency with a child, Liability for omissions; performance of duty: extent of duty, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured/without a licence, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured; aggravated vehicle taking, Causation; intervening events; death by dangerous driving, Causation; intervening acts of third party: drug importation, Causation; intervening acts of third party; manslaughter, Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillary) Ltd, Causation; intervening act of third party; pollution; strict liability, Causation; intervening acts of third party; medical treatment; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim; assault occasioning ABH, Causation; intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: lapse of time; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: joint administration; manslaughter, Causation; supply of drugs; duty of care; gross negligence manslaughter, Causation; pre-existing medical condition: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; Jehovah's Witness: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; recognisable psychiatric injury; manslaughter/GBH, Mens rea, intention; motive; doing acts likely to assist the enemy, Re A (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Separation conjoined twins: civil declaration; intention; necessity; murder, Motive; moral purpose; conspiracy to commit breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911, Malice; Mens rea; Offences against the person, Intoxication; mens rea; recklessness; specific/basic intent; arson, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; murder, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; continuing act; assault, Transferred malice; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Attorney General's Reference (No.3 of 1994), Transferred malice; murder/manslaughter; GBH rule, Transferred malice; accessories: joint enterprise; murder; Tyrell principle, Mistake; presumption of mens rea: strict liability; inciting a girl under 14 to commit an act of gross indecency, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability, Gammon Ltd. V Attorney General of Hong Kong, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; ECHR Art.7, Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; funding terrorism, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; freedom of expression; proscribed organisations; terrorism offences, Strict liability; rape of a child; ECHR arts.